Aylitical critique of Post cold war philosophers Fukuyama essays

Aylitical critique of Post cold war philosophers Fukuyama essays The cold war was a time of political and economic insecurities. It was not a battle in the sense of bloodshed but a battle purely of political ideology. It was a battle of political ideas which involved blocs and mini wars fought by the Soviet Unions allies rather than themselves. The United States was politically opposed to a communist ideology and communist influence on third world or less developed countries. These tensions began as early as World War 1, due to the Russians pulling out of the war, and continued to the late 1980s and early 1990s, when a democratic change took over. This time period is considered to be the end of the cold war. There were many articles with differing opinions written at this time. No articles were more notable and risky than Francis Fukuyamas The End of History. Fukuyama stated that history had come to an end in a sense to the emergence of a strong and unbreakable form of western liberal democracy. Fukuyamas ideas will be challenged and also better explained in the following years by other Political Scientists and philosophers such as Huntington, Barber and Sakakibara as just a few to mention. Though Fukuyama has many valid points his article is based purely on speculation. His ideas and Philosophies were so brash and new that he took much criticism but yet still opened up a whole new debate on the future of international politics. The cold war was just at its end. The Soviet Union and communism as a whole was in a bit of a retreat stage. The cold war was beginning to be viewed as the past and liberalism was beginning to be seen as the prevailing and stronger political ideology. The future as with all political struggles was still unsure. Fukuyama boldly stated that liberal democracy will not be superseded by a better or higher form of government. Large ideological battles and debates would be a thing of the past and this would also bring to an end large confli...

Rethinking the role of academic institutions in moral education

Rethinking the role of academic institutions in moral education Hashtag: #ReasonsToRespectJB Who and What Deserve Respect? Moral Education and Disrespect Respect is a universal virtue. However, conceptions of what deserves respect and who should be respected differ in culture, established local practices, and individual moral education. The characteristic of a respectable person in a particular community, for instance, is dependent on the manner by which a particular cultural group conceives and recognized the value of respect in peaceful coexistence. Ordinary people possessing culturally compliant social and emotional skills (i.e. honesty, courteousness, humility, etc.) are more likely to earn respect than a young celebrity who enjoys urinating on flag and mop bucket, resist arrest for driving under the influence, sued by neighbor for causing emotional distress, and trying to earn it back here #ReasonsToRespectJB. There are several sources of moral education but good moral training is often acquired through institutions cultivating â€Å"sense of reverence†, an attitude believed vital to morality. Academic institutions are morally educative community influencing students’ moral principle, values, and compliance with social standards. In fact, transfer of academic knowledge and development of social and culturally appropriate values and attitude in school occurs simultaneously as a formative process of linking moral values and intellectual capacity, reinforcing values learned at home and community, and developing a  strong commitment to moral behavior. The above commitment is the reason why most educated individuals are ethics-conscious, perpetually respectful of life and authority, respectful of other people’s feelings, belief, property, and rights, and easily earn the respect of others. They normally offer the apology for their mistake or negligence as truth and authenticity in moral principle deserve or earns respect. Get more information here: Practice What You Preach Human Dignity: How Is It Valued What Are the Best Ways to Conduct Research A Better Way to Understand Teams and Roles Managing Conflicts in Group Apology Alone Earns No Respect Some of the #ReasonsToRespectJB according to social media users (most probably avid fans of JB) despite nasty behavior is the courage to admit his mistake and make a public apology. Another is his well-publicized  kindness and good deeds, which is in quite interesting. Considering the fundamental moral principle associated with the apology, admission of mistakes, charity, and good deeds, these acts should be supported by important virtues to earn respect. For instance, a respect-earning apology is one that is sincere, do not make excuses for such behavior, and offered in a timely manner. Unfortunately, JB’s public apology contained praises like â€Å"I am a human being I think people forget that†, â€Å"I’m growing up, figuring some stuff out†, and others. JB even used bad publicities (ex. â€Å"labeling him gay at age 16 and a father at 17) as an excuse for his behavior. The untimely public apology blaming inherent human weakness such as young peoples’ natural curiosity, stress from bad publicity, lack of knowledge, and public misjudgment was actually considered by some social media users as the â€Å"strongest† reason to respect JB. It is really sad but insincerity deserves no respect. It is important to consider that although the courage to admit a mistake and offer an apology for them are excellent moral values, JB is a young celebrity that thrives on reputation and fans, rapidly losing disenchanted fans and product endorsement. He made so many excuses for his mistakes and therefore not guilty, insincere, and misleading the public about his true intention. Moreover, in terms of moral education, JB entered show business at a very young age and graduated from high school in 2012 with the following comments. â€Å"Im free! It was hard doing school and work every day†¦. at school, usually you have to do a lot of writing and reading. Im really not into that stuff. I like to be out there! Now, was his lack of concern over intellectual development in high school affected his moral education? Probably Yes.